[pl-PL] general.skip_to_content

Technologie

Typowa nowa biblioteka JavaScript wykazuje dużą satysfakcję, ale niewielkie wykorzystanie, co może czasami utrudniać wybór odpowiedniej technologii dla twoich potrzeb. W tym miejscu spojrzenie na dane może naprawdę pomóc wskazać właściwy kierunek.

Changes Over Time

Each line goes from 2016 to 2020. A higher point means a technology has been used by more people, and a point further to the right means more users want to learn it; or have used it and would use it again.

Negative opinionsPositive opinionsHave usedHave not usedTypeScriptTypeScript20162017201820192020ReasonReason2017201820192020ElmElm20162017201820192020ClojureScriptClojureScript20162017201820192020PureScriptPureScript20192020ReactReact20162017201820192020Vue.jsVue.js20162017201820192020AngularAngular20162017201820192020PreactPreact201820192020EmberEmber20162017201820192020SvelteSvelte20192020ReduxRedux20162017201820192020Apollo ClientApollo Client20162017201820192020GraphQLGraphQL20162017201820192020MobXMobX20162017201820192020RelayRelay20162017201820192020ExpressExpress2017201820192020Next.jsNext.js201820192020KoaKoa2017201820192020MeteorMeteor20162017201820192020GatsbyGatsby20192020HapiHapi20172020JestJest20162017201820192020MochaMocha20162017201820192020StorybookStorybook201820192020CypressCypress20192020AVAAVA20162017201820192020JasmineJasmine20162017201820192020PuppeteerPuppeteer20192020webpackwebpack201620172020GulpGulp201620172020RollupRollup20172020BrowserifyBrowserify201620172020ElectronElectron2017201820192020React NativeReact Native20162017201820192020Native AppsNative Apps20162017201820192020CordovaCordova20162017201820192020IonicIonic2017201820192020NW.jsNW.js20192020ExpoExpo20192020
  • Some lines skip years.
  • Technologies with only one year of data are not shown.

Satysfakcja vs Wykorzystanie

Ten diagram pokazuje poziom zadowolenia w stosunku do całkowitej ilości użytkowników. Można go podzielić na cztery kwadranty:

  • ASSESS: Rzadko wykorzystywane, wysoka satysfakcja. Technologie, które warto mieć na oku.

  • ADOPT: Często wykorzystywane, wysoka satysfakcja. Technologie warte przyswojenia.

  • AVOID: Rzadko wykorzystywane, niska satysfakcja. Technologie, których aktualnie raczej lepiej unikać.

  • ANALYZE: Często wykorzystywane, niska satysfakcja. Zastanów się ponownie jeżeli używasz aktualnie tych technologii.

ASSESSADOPTAVOIDANALYZE02000400060008000100001200014000160001800020000Ilość Użytkowników0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%Procent Zadowolenia1682292.96%TypeScript87870.62%Reason134163.31%Elm66058.94%ClojureScript47672.27%PureScript1722587.49%React1060385.16%Vue.js1212741.61%Angular291678.02%Preact240727%Ember316188.9%Svelte72782.26%Alpine.js116977.59%LitElement28367.14%Stimulus1427766.82%Redux706787.86%Apollo Client1015793.82%GraphQL283863.92%MobX95555.92%Relay106587.04%XState648587.62%Vuex1697291.7%Express782292.34%Next.js331475.98%Koa262227.73%Meteor360387.95%Nuxt603369.52%Gatsby275287.1%Nest195378.6%Strapi128889.29%Fastify196659.77%Hapi1431296.25%Jest1114473.96%Mocha893291.33%Storybook744893.72%Cypress165461.12%AVA892862.24%Jasmine712287.57%Puppeteer562396.59%Testing Library70593.33%Playwright211753.19%WebdriverIO1852787.62%webpack575885.17%Parcel1377035.02%Gulp635884.78%Rollup737534.77%Browserify1307892.33%TypeScript17060%Rome115293.84%Snowpack18679.57%SWC115793.86%esbuild692988.47%Electron733481.69%React Native265279.86%Native Apps722930.14%Cordova609851.72%Ionic200983.82%Capacitor93335.05%NW.js494176.22%Expo74369.85%Quasar

Note that TypeScript appears twice in the chart because it's included in both the JavaScript Flavors and Build Tools sections.

Technology Usage Cardinality

For each section, which percentage of respondents use (defined as having answered “would use again”) one, two, three, etc. technologies.

1
61.7%
2
4.7%
3
0.9%
4
0.2%
5
0.1%
Odmiany JavaScript
1
41.9%
2
29.7%
3
11.8%
4
3.0%
5
0.7%
6
0.2%
7
0.0%
8
0.0%
9
0.0%
Frameworki Front-endowe
1
28.4%
2
19.9%
3
15.1%
4
5.9%
5
1.1%
6
0.2%
7
0.0%
Warstwa Danych
1
27.8%
2
24.0%
3
14.3%
4
6.6%
5
2.5%
6
0.9%
7
0.3%
8
0.1%
9
0.0%
10
0.0%
Frameworki Back-endowe
1
13.1%
2
14.3%
3
15.6%
4
13.9%
5
9.5%
6
5.1%
7
1.9%
8
0.5%
9
0.1%
10
0.0%
Testowanie
1
19.9%
2
28.2%
3
19.3%
4
10.1%
5
3.9%
6
1.2%
7
0.3%
8
0.1%
9
0.0%
10
0.0%
Narzędzia Buildujące
1
19.8%
2
16.9%
3
9.9%
4
3.9%
5
1.2%
6
0.5%
7
0.1%
8
0.0%
9
0.0%
Urządzenia Mobilne i Stacjonarne

Technology Usage Cardinality

For each section, which percentage of respondents use (defined as having answered “would use again”) one, two, three, etc. technologies.

javascript_flavors
PureScript
Reason
ClojureScript
Elm
TypeScript
front_end_frameworks
Stimulus
Alpine.js
LitElement
Preact
Vue.js
Svelte
Ember
React
Angular
datalayer
Relay
XState
MobX
Vuex
Apollo Client
Redux
GraphQL
back_end_frameworks
Fastify
Meteor
Strapi
Hapi
Gatsby
Nest
Nuxt
Koa
Next.js
Express
testing
Testing Library
WebdriverIO
AVA
Playwright
Puppeteer
Jasmine
Storybook
Mocha
Cypress
Jest
build_tools
Rome
esbuild
Snowpack
SWC
TypeScript
Gulp
Browserify
Parcel
Rollup
webpack
mobile_desktop
Quasar
NW.js
Capacitor
Electron
Ionic
Native Apps
Expo
Cordova
React Native
« Poprzednie: Inna FunkcjonalnośćNastępne: Odmiany JavaScript »
Wykresy zbudowane przy użyciu Nivo. Hosted by Netlify.
Pytania? Znalazłeś błąd? Zgłoś uwagę. Dołącz do nas na Discord.
Wciśnij option/alt, by uruchomić tryb tłumacza.