기술

일반적인 새 자바스크립트 라이브러리는 만족도는 높지만 사용량은 낮기 때문에 필요에 적합한 기술을 선택하는 것이 다소 까다로울 수 있습니다. 여기의 데이터를 보면 올바른 방향을 찾는 데 도움이 될 수 있습니다.

Each line goes from 2016 to 2020. A higher point means a technology has been used by more people, and a point further to the right means more users want to learn it; or have used it and would use it again.

Negative opinionsPositive opinionsHave usedHave not usedTypeScriptTypeScript20162017201820192020ReasonReason2017201820192020ElmElm20162017201820192020ClojureScriptClojureScript20162017201820192020PureScriptPureScript20192020ReactReact20162017201820192020Vue.jsVue.js20162017201820192020AngularAngular20162017201820192020PreactPreact201820192020EmberEmber20162017201820192020SvelteSvelte20192020ReduxRedux20162017201820192020Apollo ClientApollo Client20162017201820192020GraphQLGraphQL20162017201820192020MobXMobX20162017201820192020RelayRelay20162017201820192020ExpressExpress2017201820192020Next.jsNext.js201820192020KoaKoa2017201820192020MeteorMeteor20162017201820192020GatsbyGatsby20192020HapiHapi20172020JestJest20162017201820192020MochaMocha20162017201820192020StorybookStorybook201820192020CypressCypress20192020AVAAVA20162017201820192020JasmineJasmine20162017201820192020PuppeteerPuppeteer20192020webpackwebpack201620172020GulpGulp201620172020RollupRollup20172020BrowserifyBrowserify201620172020ElectronElectron2017201820192020React NativeReact Native20162017201820192020Native AppsNative Apps20162017201820192020CordovaCordova20162017201820192020IonicIonic2017201820192020NW.jsNW.js20192020ExpoExpo20192020
  • Some lines skip years.
  • Technologies with only one year of data are not shown.

이 차트는 각 기술의 전체 사용자 수 대비 만족도 비율을 보여줍니다. 차트를 사분면으로 나누면:

  • 평가: 낮은 사용량, 높은 만족도. 지켜볼 만한 기술.

  • 적용: 높은 사용량, 높은 만족도. 적용하기에 안전한 기술.

  • 기피: 낮은 사용량, 낮은 만족도. 현재는 피하는게 좋은 기술.

  • 검토: 높은 사용량, 낮은 만족도. 이러한 기술을 현재 사용 중이라면 재검토해 볼 것.

Note that TypeScript appears twice in the chart because it's included in both the JavaScript Flavors and Build Tools sections.

For each section, which percentage of respondents use (defined as having answered “would use again”) one, two, three, etc. technologies.

1
61.7%
2
4.7%
3
0.9%
4
0.2%
5
0.1%
자바스크립트 취향
1
41.9%
2
29.7%
3
11.8%
4
3.0%
5
0.7%
6
0.2%
7
0.0%
8
0.0%
9
0.0%
프론트엔드 프레임워크
1
28.4%
2
19.9%
3
15.1%
4
5.9%
5
1.1%
6
0.2%
7
0.0%
데이터 계층
1
27.8%
2
24.0%
3
14.3%
4
6.6%
5
2.5%
6
0.9%
7
0.3%
8
0.1%
9
0.0%
10
0.0%
백엔드 프레임워크
1
13.1%
2
14.3%
3
15.6%
4
13.9%
5
9.5%
6
5.1%
7
1.9%
8
0.5%
9
0.1%
10
0.0%
테스팅
1
19.9%
2
28.2%
3
19.3%
4
10.1%
5
3.9%
6
1.2%
7
0.3%
8
0.1%
9
0.0%
10
0.0%
빌드 도구
1
19.8%
2
16.9%
3
9.9%
4
3.9%
5
1.2%
6
0.5%
7
0.1%
8
0.0%
9
0.0%
모바일 & 데스크탑

For each section, which percentage of respondents use (defined as having answered “would use again”) one, two, three, etc. technologies.

Rome
ClojureScript
Quasar
Playwright
Alpine.js
Stimulus
PureScript
SWC
AVA
Relay
esbuild
LitElement
Capacitor
Reason
WebdriverIO
Snowpack
Hapi
NW.js
Elm
Fastify
XState
Ember
Strapi
Rollup
MobX
Native Apps
Svelte
Vuex
Expo
Koa
Preact
Testing Library
Parcel
Nuxt
Nest
Ionic
Meteor
Gatsby
Cypress
Puppeteer
Cordova
Browserify
Next.js
Mocha
Jasmine
GraphQL
Apollo Client
React Native
Angular
Vue.js
Electron
Storybook
TypeScript
Express
React
webpack
Redux
Jest
TypeScript
Gulp