[fa-IR] general.skip_to_content

Technologies

The typical new JavaScript library shows high satisfaction but low usage, which can sometimes make selecting the right technology for your needs a bit tricky. This is where looking at the data can really help point you in the right direction.

Each line goes from 2016 to 2020. A higher point means a technology has been used by more people, and a point further to the right means more users want to learn it; or have used it and would use it again.

Negative opinionsPositive opinionsHave usedHave not usedTypeScriptTypeScript20162017201820192020ReasonReason2017201820192020ElmElm20162017201820192020ClojureScriptClojureScript20162017201820192020PureScriptPureScript20192020ReactReact20162017201820192020Vue.jsVue.js20162017201820192020AngularAngular20162017201820192020PreactPreact201820192020EmberEmber20162017201820192020SvelteSvelte20192020ReduxRedux20162017201820192020Apollo ClientApollo Client20162017201820192020GraphQLGraphQL20162017201820192020MobXMobX20162017201820192020RelayRelay20162017201820192020ExpressExpress2017201820192020Next.jsNext.js201820192020KoaKoa2017201820192020MeteorMeteor20162017201820192020GatsbyGatsby20192020HapiHapi20172020JestJest20162017201820192020MochaMocha20162017201820192020StorybookStorybook201820192020CypressCypress20192020AVAAVA20162017201820192020JasmineJasmine20162017201820192020PuppeteerPuppeteer20192020webpackwebpack201620172020GulpGulp201620172020RollupRollup20172020BrowserifyBrowserify201620172020ElectronElectron2017201820192020React NativeReact Native20162017201820192020Native AppsNative Apps20162017201820192020CordovaCordova20162017201820192020IonicIonic2017201820192020NW.jsNW.js20192020ExpoExpo20192020
  • Some lines skip years.
  • Technologies with only one year of data are not shown.

This chart shows each technology’s satisfaction ratio over its total user count. It can be divided into four quadrants:

  • ASSESS: Low usage, high satisfaction. Technologies worth keeping an eye on.

  • ADOPT: High usage, high satisfaction. Safe technologies to adopt.

  • AVOID: Low usage, low satisfaction. Technologies probably best avoided currently.

  • ANALYZE: High usage, low satisfaction. Reassess these technologies if you're currently using them.

ASSESSADOPTAVOIDANALYZE02000400060008000100001200014000160001800020000User Count0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%Satisfaction Percentage1682292.96%TypeScript87870.62%Reason134163.31%Elm66058.94%ClojureScript47672.27%PureScript1722587.49%React1060385.16%Vue.js1212741.61%Angular291678.02%Preact240727%Ember316188.9%Svelte72782.26%Alpine.js116977.59%LitElement28367.14%Stimulus1427766.82%Redux706787.86%Apollo Client1015793.82%GraphQL283863.92%MobX95555.92%Relay106587.04%XState648587.62%Vuex1697291.7%Express782292.34%Next.js331475.98%Koa262227.73%Meteor360387.95%Nuxt603369.52%Gatsby275287.1%Nest195378.6%Strapi128889.29%Fastify196659.77%Hapi1431296.25%Jest1114473.96%Mocha893291.33%Storybook744893.72%Cypress165461.12%AVA892862.24%Jasmine712287.57%Puppeteer562396.59%Testing Library70593.33%Playwright211753.19%WebdriverIO1852787.62%webpack575885.17%Parcel1377035.02%Gulp635884.78%Rollup737534.77%Browserify1307892.33%TypeScript17060%Rome115293.84%Snowpack18679.57%SWC115793.86%esbuild692988.47%Electron733481.69%React Native265279.86%Native Apps722930.14%Cordova609851.72%Ionic200983.82%Capacitor93335.05%NW.js494176.22%Expo74369.85%Quasar

Note that TypeScript appears twice in the chart because it's included in both the JavaScript Flavors and Build Tools sections.

For each section, which percentage of respondents use (defined as having answered “would use again”) one, two, three, etc. technologies.

1
61.7%
2
4.7%
3
0.9%
4
0.2%
5
0.1%
زبانهای قابل تبدیل به جاوااسکریپت
1
41.9%
2
29.7%
3
11.8%
4
3.0%
5
0.7%
6
0.2%
7
0.0%
8
0.0%
9
0.0%
فریمورک های نمایشی (Front-end)
1
28.4%
2
19.9%
3
15.1%
4
5.9%
5
1.1%
6
0.2%
7
0.0%
لایه داده ها
1
27.8%
2
24.0%
3
14.3%
4
6.6%
5
2.5%
6
0.9%
7
0.3%
8
0.1%
9
0.0%
10
0.0%
فریمورکه ای سروری (Back-end)
1
13.1%
2
14.3%
3
15.6%
4
13.9%
5
9.5%
6
5.1%
7
1.9%
8
0.5%
9
0.1%
10
0.0%
تست
1
19.9%
2
28.2%
3
19.3%
4
10.1%
5
3.9%
6
1.2%
7
0.3%
8
0.1%
9
0.0%
10
0.0%
برنامه های بیلد (Build Tools)
1
19.8%
2
16.9%
3
9.9%
4
3.9%
5
1.2%
6
0.5%
7
0.1%
8
0.0%
9
0.0%
موبایل و دسکتاپ

For each section, which percentage of respondents use (defined as having answered “would use again”) one, two, three, etc. technologies.

javascript_flavors
PureScript
Reason
ClojureScript
Elm
TypeScript
front_end_frameworks
Stimulus
Alpine.js
LitElement
Ember
Svelte
Vue.js
Preact
Angular
React
datalayer
XState
Relay
Apollo Client
Vuex
MobX
Redux
GraphQL
back_end_frameworks
Fastify
Hapi
Meteor
Strapi
Nuxt
Gatsby
Koa
Nest
Next.js
Express
testing
Playwright
AVA
WebdriverIO
Testing Library
Storybook
Mocha
Jasmine
Puppeteer
Cypress
Jest
build_tools
esbuild
Snowpack
Rome
SWC
Browserify
Parcel
TypeScript
Gulp
Rollup
webpack
mobile_desktop
NW.js
Capacitor
Quasar
Ionic
Native Apps
Expo
Electron
React Native
Cordova