Testen
Werkzeuge, um den Code zu testen.
Rangliste
Einstufung von Bekanntheit, Interesse und Zufriedenheit.
Technologies with less than 10% awareness not included. Each ratio is defined as follows:
- Satisfaction: would use again / (would use again + would not use again)
- Interest: want to learn / (want to learn + not interested)
- Usage: (would use again + would not use again) / total
- Awareness: (total - never heard) / total
We asked members of the JavaScript community to share their “pick of the year”
Erfahrung über Zeit
Überblick über Meinungen zu Technologien, abgefragt über die Zeit.
| Würde ich nicht verwenden | |
| Kein Interesse | |
| Würde ich wieder verwenden | |
| Interessiert | |
| Nie davon gehört |
Technologies with only one year of data are not included.
This chart splits positive (“want to learn”, “would use again”) vs negative (“not interested”, “would not use again”) experiences on both sides of a central axis.
Bar thickness represents the number of respondents aware of a technology.
Andere WerkzeugeFortschritt: 1.7% (403)Fortschritt: 1.7% (403)
Fortschritt: 1.7% (403)
Fortschritt: 1.7% (403)
Andere Werkzeuge in dieser Kategorie (Freifeldtext).
Auf einer Skala von eins (sehr unzufrieden) bis fünf (sehr zufrieden), wie zufrieden sind Entwickler allgemein mit dem Status in dieser Kategorie?
Recommended Resources
WebTestIt - a Free Tool for Creating UI Tests for Web Applications
WebTestIt lets developers build reliable and efficient UI web tests for Selenium and Protractor. Check it out.
Mike North
JavaScript and TypeScript Monorepos
You'll get hands-on experience with best-in-class tools designed to keep the workflows for even complex projects simple!
Thanks to our partners for supporting us! Learn more.