[ca-ES] general.skip_to_content

Tecnologies

La nova llibreria de JavaScript ens mostra una alta satisfacció però poc ús, cosa que fa que algunes vegades sigui difícil escollir la tecnologia que necessites. És en aquest punt on el fet de mirar les dades et pot ajudar a orientar-vos cap a la bona direcció.

Changes Over Time

Each line goes from 2016 to 2020. A higher point means a technology has been used by more people, and a point further to the right means more users want to learn it; or have used it and would use it again.

Negative opinionsPositive opinionsHave usedHave not usedTypeScriptTypeScript20162017201820192020ReasonReason2017201820192020ElmElm20162017201820192020ClojureScriptClojureScript20162017201820192020PureScriptPureScript20192020ReactReact20162017201820192020Vue.jsVue.js20162017201820192020AngularAngular20162017201820192020PreactPreact201820192020EmberEmber20162017201820192020SvelteSvelte20192020ReduxRedux20162017201820192020Apollo ClientApollo Client20162017201820192020GraphQLGraphQL20162017201820192020MobXMobX20162017201820192020RelayRelay20162017201820192020ExpressExpress2017201820192020Next.jsNext.js201820192020KoaKoa2017201820192020MeteorMeteor20162017201820192020GatsbyGatsby20192020HapiHapi20172020JestJest20162017201820192020MochaMocha20162017201820192020StorybookStorybook201820192020CypressCypress20192020AVAAVA20162017201820192020JasmineJasmine20162017201820192020PuppeteerPuppeteer20192020webpackwebpack201620172020GulpGulp201620172020RollupRollup20172020BrowserifyBrowserify201620172020ElectronElectron2017201820192020React NativeReact Native20162017201820192020Native AppsNative Apps20162017201820192020CordovaCordova20162017201820192020IonicIonic2017201820192020NW.jsNW.js20192020ExpoExpo20192020
  • Some lines skip years.
  • Technologies with only one year of data are not shown.

Satisfacció vs Ús

Aquest gràfic mostra la proporció de satisfacció de cada tecnologia sobre el nombre d'usuaris total. El podem dividir en quatre quadrants:

  • AVALUACIÓ: Poc ús, alta satisfacció. Tecnologies que val la pena tenir en compte.

  • ADOPTAR: Üs elevat, alta satisfacció. Tecnologies segures per adoptar.

  • EVITAR: Poc ús, baixa satisfacció. Tecnologies a evitar actualment.

  • ANALITZAR: Alt ús, baixa satisfacció. Fer una revisió d'aquestes tecnologies si les fas servir actualment.

AVALUARADOPTAREVITARANALITZAR02000400060008000100001200014000160001800020000Nombre d'usuaris0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%Percentatge de satisfacció1682292.96%TypeScript87870.62%Reason134163.31%Elm66058.94%ClojureScript47672.27%PureScript1722587.49%React1060385.16%Vue.js1212741.61%Angular291678.02%Preact240727%Ember316188.9%Svelte72782.26%Alpine.js116977.59%LitElement28367.14%Stimulus1427766.82%Redux706787.86%Apollo Client1015793.82%GraphQL283863.92%MobX95555.92%Relay106587.04%XState648587.62%Vuex1697291.7%Express782292.34%Next.js331475.98%Koa262227.73%Meteor360387.95%Nuxt603369.52%Gatsby275287.1%Nest195378.6%Strapi128889.29%Fastify196659.77%Hapi1431296.25%Jest1114473.96%Mocha893291.33%Storybook744893.72%Cypress165461.12%AVA892862.24%Jasmine712287.57%Puppeteer562396.59%Testing Library70593.33%Playwright211753.19%WebdriverIO1852787.62%webpack575885.17%Parcel1377035.02%Gulp635884.78%Rollup737534.77%Browserify1307892.33%TypeScript17060%Rome115293.84%Snowpack18679.57%SWC115793.86%esbuild692988.47%Electron733481.69%React Native265279.86%Native Apps722930.14%Cordova609851.72%Ionic200983.82%Capacitor93335.05%NW.js494176.22%Expo74369.85%Quasar

Note that TypeScript appears twice in the chart because it's included in both the JavaScript Flavors and Build Tools sections.

Technology Usage Cardinality

For each section, which percentage of respondents use (defined as having answered “would use again”) one, two, three, etc. technologies.

1
61.7%
2
4.7%
3
0.9%
4
0.2%
5
0.1%
Savors de JavaScript
1
41.9%
2
29.7%
3
11.8%
4
3.0%
5
0.7%
6
0.2%
7
0.0%
8
0.0%
9
0.0%
Frameworks front-end
1
28.4%
2
19.9%
3
15.1%
4
5.9%
5
1.1%
6
0.2%
7
0.0%
Data Layer
1
27.8%
2
24.0%
3
14.3%
4
6.6%
5
2.5%
6
0.9%
7
0.3%
8
0.1%
9
0.0%
10
0.0%
Frameworks back-end
1
13.1%
2
14.3%
3
15.6%
4
13.9%
5
9.5%
6
5.1%
7
1.9%
8
0.5%
9
0.1%
10
0.0%
Testeig
1
19.9%
2
28.2%
3
19.3%
4
10.1%
5
3.9%
6
1.2%
7
0.3%
8
0.1%
9
0.0%
10
0.0%
Eines de Build
1
19.8%
2
16.9%
3
9.9%
4
3.9%
5
1.2%
6
0.5%
7
0.1%
8
0.0%
9
0.0%
Mòbil i escriptori

Technology Usage Cardinality

For each section, which percentage of respondents use (defined as having answered “would use again”) one, two, three, etc. technologies.

javascript_flavors
PureScript
Reason
ClojureScript
Elm
TypeScript
front_end_frameworks
Stimulus
LitElement
Alpine.js
Vue.js
Ember
Svelte
Preact
Angular
React
datalayer
Relay
XState
MobX
Vuex
Apollo Client
GraphQL
Redux
back_end_frameworks
Strapi
Hapi
Meteor
Fastify
Nuxt
Nest
Next.js
Gatsby
Koa
Express
testing
Testing Library
WebdriverIO
Playwright
AVA
Storybook
Jasmine
Cypress
Puppeteer
Mocha
Jest
build_tools
SWC
esbuild
Rome
Snowpack
Parcel
Rollup
Browserify
Gulp
TypeScript
webpack
mobile_desktop
Quasar
NW.js
Capacitor
Ionic
Native Apps
Expo
Electron
React Native
Cordova
« Anterior: Altres característiquesSegüent: Savors de JavaScript »
Gràfics creats amb Nivo. Allotjat per Netlify.
Tens preguntes? Has trobat un error? Obre'ns una incidència. Uneix-te a Discord.
Prem option/alt per habilitar el mode de traducció.